Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazem Ali (scientist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Hazem Ali (scientist)

Hazem Ali (scientist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable person - would nominate for CSD but would prefer that the community can decide. Nördic Nightfury 10:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

• Delete - all but one of the sources are from two publishers, no indication of significant media coverage therefore failing WP:GNG. DrStrauss talk 10:55, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

• Delete I can't find a single thing about him in reliable sources. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
  • this also seems to represent the fourth effort by SPA User:RoyWings to create a promotional article about this utterly unremarkable person. I'm going to issue him a warning: previous articles had been deleted enough times for him to understand that Ali was not notable. He simply tried to invade it by creating the article under different names. There's no reason for us to put up with this in perpetuity. He should be blocked if this continues. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

FYI all - I suspect some socking is going on - I have opened a case - here. Nördic Nightfury 13:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

• Delete If developing the first computer programing language that codes in Arabic was truly notable, this fact would be sourced to something other than his profile on the weibsite of his company.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.